Raleigh divorce attorney Charles R. Ullman has weighed in on a high-profile lawsuit filed under North Carolina's 'homewrecker' law, which allows a spouse to sue a third party for interfering with their marriage. The case involves former Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, who has been accused of having an affair with her married bodyguard. The bodyguard's wife filed the alienation of affection claim in Moore County Superior Court, alleging that Sinema knowingly pursued her husband despite his marital status.
Ullman, a Board-Certified Specialist in Family Law with 25 years of experience, appeared on Fox News Digital to discuss the case. He emphasized that alienation of affection claims provide a vital path for a wronged spouse to hold an affair partner legally accountable. 'I think it's more about trying to find a remedy. Giving the person that's been wronged an opportunity at getting some type of relief,' Ullman said.
North Carolina is one of the few states that still recognizes alienation of affection as a civil wrong, allowing a spouse to sue a third party who has interfered with their marriage, causing loss of love and affection. This case has sparked debate over whether someone who breaks up a marriage should be held financially responsible. However, Ullman sees these claims as a way to provide justice for the harmed spouse.
The lawsuit against Sinema alleges that she sent romantic messages, gave gifts, and took the bodyguard on trips, despite knowing he was married with children. The case highlights the ongoing relevance of North Carolina's 'homewrecker' law, which remains controversial but is upheld by some as a deterrent against marital interference.
Ullman, founder of Charles R. Ullman & Associates, has built a reputation for handling complex family law cases, including divorces involving infidelity. His firm focuses on helping families in Wake County and across North Carolina navigate difficult legal matters such as separation, divorce, child custody, and property division.
The Sinema case has drawn national attention, putting North Carolina's unique law in the spotlight. As the lawsuit progresses, it may influence public opinion on whether alienation of affection claims should continue to be recognized in the state. Ullman's comments underscore the importance of these laws for individuals seeking legal recourse after marital infidelity.
